*Professor Ruggero Maria Santilli
President, The Institute for Basic Research
Palm Harbor, Florida, U.S.A.*

**NOTE: The name of the distinguished scientist who filed the nomination and its affiliation have been removed because inessential. The scientific content of the nomination is the important part.**

**September 15, 2007
**

**
TO: Professors Per Carlson (Chairman)
Lars Bergström, Börje Johansson, Björn Jonson,
Ingemar Lundström, and Joseph Nordgren
Nobe;l Committee for Physics
P.O. Box 5232, SE-102 45 Stockholm, Sweden
**

**
**
Professor Ruggero Maria Santilli has been recommended for the Nobel Prize in Physics beginning with the year 1984 because of his historical discoveries. In this additional nomination, I want to establish a record of the scientific documentation released to the Nobel Foundation since 1984, as well as of the additional documentation motivating this nomination for 2007.

**OUTLINE OF PAST NOMINATIONS OF
PROFESSOR RUGGERO MARIA SANTILLI**

During the twenty three years passed since the first nomination in 1984 of Prof. Ruggero Maria Santilli for the Nobel Prize in Physics, your Committee has received a rather vast documentation on the scientific production of this nominee.

The documentation includes complimentary copies of fourteen monographs authored by Prof. Santilli (Refs. [1-14]), seven monographs authored by independent scholars carrying the name "Santilli" in the title (Refs. [15-21]) and hundreds of papers published in refereed journals around the world (additional copies of this documentation are at your disposal on request in the event lost of misplaced). This scientific documentation included in particular:

1) The first documentation sent to the Nobel Foundation decades ago deals with the historical papers by Prof. Santilli written in 1978 when at Harvard University under research support from the U. S. Department of Energy (contracts numbers ER-78-S-02-47420.A000, AS02-78ER04742, DE-ACO2-80ER10651; DE-ACO2-80ER-10651.A001, and DE-ACO2-80ER10651.A002 administered by Harvard University) and numerous subsequent works. The documentation deals with the conception and development of the covering of quantum mechanics known as **hadronic mechanics** along the following main lines:

*OBJECTIVE:* Develop a covering of quantum mechanics permitting the conception and quantitative treatment of new clean energies and fuels that are inconceivable with quantum mechanics, such as the possible utilization of the energy contained within the structure of the neutron.

*MEANS:* Identify new mathematics for the quantitative representation of contact, nonlinear, nonlocal and nonpotential interactions expected in deep overlappings of the wave packets and/or charge distribution of particles at mutual distances of one Fermi or less and other non-Hamiltonian features, such as the extended, nonspherical and deformable character of particles;

*NECESSITY:* the above non-Hamiltonian interactions are dismissed by organized interests on old doctrines on grounds that they ³disappear² when macroscopic objects are reduced to their particle constituents. However, this view is knows by ethical experts to be nonscientific due to the *No Reduction Theorems* (a macroscopic object under nonconservative and irreversible conditions cannot be consistently reduced to a collection of ideal quantum particles all in conservative and reversible conditions and, vice versa, a finite ensamble of the latter cannot consistently reproduce our macroscopic phyusical reality). This foundation is complemented by a vast body of evidence on the limitation of quantum mechanics under the conditions considered (see for details on, e.g., the Forum on Old Theories. At any rate, quantum mechanics is reversible over time, while physical realities, including all energy releasing processes, are generally irreversible over time. Any dismissal of the need to construct a covering of quantum mechanics is, therefore, nonscientific.

*UNIVERSALITY:* Due to the use of coverings of the limited mathematics of quantum mechanics indicated below (Santilli iso-, geno., and hypermathematics), hadronic mechanics has been proved to be *directly universal*, that is, capable of representing ALL infinitely possible systems with linear and nonlinear, local and nonlocal, potential and nonpotential, reversible or irreversible and single-valued or multi-valued interactions (universality) directly in the frame of the observer without any use of coordinate transformations (direct universality). Hence, searcher for alternative formulations are either sheer plagiarism or a figment of minds outside scientific realities.

*INVARIANCE.* A reason for the axiomatic consistency of quantum mechanics is that it predicts the same numerical values under the same conditions at different times. All structural broadening of quantum mechanics have a nonunitary structure as a condition to admit non-Hamiltonian forces. But all nonunitary models verify the Theorems of Catastrophic Mathematical and Physical Inconsistencies (see Chapter 1 of Hadronic Mathematics, Mechansics and Chemistry). The importance of Santilli iso-, geno-, and hyper mathematics is that of permitting exactly the same invariance of numerical prediction as that possessed by quantum mechanics, thus being the ONLY available generalization of quantum mechanics usable in experimenters.

*COVERING.* Santilli iso-, geno- and hyper-mathematics and related branches of hadronic mechanics recover quantum mechanics uniquely and identically whenever all forces return to be Hamiltonian, a feature generally occurring for all mutual distances of particles bigger than one Fermi. Also, hadronic mechanics uses the same abstract axioms of quantum mechanics and only provides their broader realization, to such an extent that quantum and hadronic mechanics coincide at the abstract, realization-free level. Finally, *hadronic mechanics constitutes a concrete realization of hidden variables as well as of the "completion" of quantum mechanics according to Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen, realized at short distances by Prof. Santilli via the use of his new mathematics.*

*VERIFICATIONS.* Hadron ic mechanics has nowadays experimental verifications in particle physics, nuclear physics, superconductivity, chemistry, biology, astrophysics and cosmology [9-11].

*APPLICATIONS.* Hadronic mechanics has seen several millions of dollars of industrial investments for new clean fuels, new clean energies, new chemical compounds, etc (see, e.g., the web site www.magnegas.com).

The underwriter wants to have a record that the above documentation, in the possession of the Nobel Committee for Physics for decades, has a scientific value superior to and more relevant that that of all Nobel Prizes in Physics granted in recent times.

2) The second documentation mailed to the Nobel Foundations decades ago deals with the discovery by Prof. Santilli on a first broadening of Lie¹s theory for the treatment of nonlinear, nonlocal and nonpotential systems, today known as the **Lie-Santilli isotheory** [18], including in particular the discovery of the covering of the Lorentz transformations for the invariance of the most general possible line element in spacetime, including gravitational line elements, today known as the **Lorentz-Santilli isosymmetry** and **Lie-Santilli geno- and hyper-theories, Lorentz-Santilli geno- and hyper-mathematics, and the geno- and hyper-relativities,** necessary for the treatment of irreversible single-valued and irreversible multi-valued systems, respectively.

The underwriter wants to have a record that the above second documentation, in the possession of the Nobel Committee for Physics for decades, has a scientific value, alone, superior to that of all Nobel Prizes in Physics granted in recent times.

3) The third documentation mailed to the Nobel Foundation one decades ago deals with a basically new theory of antimatter that allowed, for the first time in history, to treat antimatter at all levels of study, from Newton to second quantization, today known as **Santilli isodual theory of antimatter** [12]. Prior to this discovery, matter could be treated at all levels, while antimatter could only be treated at the level of second quantization, resulting in one of the biggest scientific imbalances of the 20-th century. These additional discoveries include, as particular cases, *the first known possibility for quantitative studies as to whether far away galaxies and quasars are made up of matter or of antimatter.* Additionally, these studies lead to the *first and only known axiomatically consistent²grand unification of electroweak and gravitational interactions, where ³axiomatic consistency² is referred to the first and only known inclusion of antimatter on equal footing than matter, as well as the capability of avoiding the above indicated Theorems of Catastrophic Inconsistency of Nonunitary theories.* To understand the achievement, serious scholars should admit that ALL other grand unifications are catastrophically inconsistent because they include gravitation realized via curvature, besides ignoring antimatter and other features.

The underwriter wants to have a record that the above third documentation, also in the possession of the Nobel Committee for Physics for decades, has a scientific value, alone, superior to that of all Nobel Prizes in Physics granted in recent times.

**SCIENTIFIC DOCUMENTATION OF THE
NEW NOMINATION OF PROFESSOR RUGGERO MARIA SANTILLI
FOR THE NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSICS**

With the clear understanding that the documentation already provided to the Nobel Foundation for decades has a scientific value superior to that of any Nobel Prize in Physics granted in recent times, this additional nomination of Prof. Santilli for the 2007 Nobel Prize in Physics is intended to establish a record that the Nobel Foundation has received copies, herewith attached, of the following more recent publications and discoveries by Prof. Santilli:

4) R. M. Santilli, "Lie-admissible invariant representation of irreversibility in classical and operator mechanics for matter and antimatter," published by the Italian Physical Society at Il Nuovo Cimento B, Vol 121, pages 443-486 (2006.
Download pdf format of this paper

This additional historical memoir begins with a presentation of the * Theorems of Catastrophic Mathematical and Physical Inconsistencies of Noncanonical and Nonunitary Theories;* identifies numerous theories that are catastrophically inconsistent (some of which recipient of Nobel Prizes); and then presents the first and only known, axiomatically consistent and invariant, mathematical, physical and chemical treatment of irreversible processes. This paper, per se, is sufficient for a Nobel Prize in Physic because all theories subject of Nobel Prizes in Physics and Chemistry are fully reversible over time, while physical reality is not.

5) R. M. Santilli, "The novel 'controlled intermediate nuclear fusion' and its possible industrial realization as predicted by hadronic mechanics," published by the Journal of Applied Sciences, 2007.
Download pdf format of this paper

Mankind has a serious need for new clean energies due to our fastly deteriorating environment. All energies that could be predicted by quantum mechanics and Einstein special relativity were fully identified by the middle of the 20-th century and they all turned out to be environmentally unacceptable. At any rate, all energy releasing processes are irreversible over time while all theories to date that received a Nobel Prize in physics are fully reversible. Hence, the latter cannot be credibly claimed to be exact for energy related applications. A graduate student has proved that Einstein special relativity and quantum mechanics predict a finite probability for the spontaneous disintegration of a nucleus n => n_1 _ n_2 following its synthesis n_1+n_2 => n, again, due to their reversible character. In this additional historical discovery, Prof. Santilli has identified the reasons both the "cold" and the "hot" fusions have failed to reach industrial usages despite the investments of very large public sums. the discovery is synthesized in seven laws that have to be verified for environmentally acceptable nuclear fusions to occur, most of which are violated by the "cold" and the "hot" fusions. This has resulted in the discovery of a new class of fusions ³intermediate² between the failed "cold" and "hot" fusions that is now seeing large industrial investments. The Nobel Committee should note the crucial role of the irreversible (Lie-admissible) branch of hadronic mechanics for a credible study on new energies due to their irreversible character.

6) R. M. Santilli, "Etherino and/or neutrino?", published by Foundations of Physics, Vol. 37, p. 670 (2007).
Download pdf format of this paper

The neutrino hypothesis was conceived in order to maintain the validity of quantum mechanics for the synthesis of the neutron in the core of stars according to the known reaction p + e => n + v. Prof. Santilli pointed out in 1978 (Documentation 1) that this salvage operation failed because the Schroedinger equation becomes physically inconsistent for the neutron synthesis since the rest energy of the neutron is 0.78 MeV bigger than the sum of the rest energies of the proton and the electron. These data require a **positive binding energy** that is anathema for quantum mechanics. The dream of salvaging quantum mechanics via the the complementary reaction p + e + anti(v) => n would be excessively nonscientific because the antineutron has a virtually null scattering cross section with protons and neutrons. The inability by quantum mechanics to provide ANY scientific (that is, quantitative) representation of the neutron synthesis was the basic motivation for the construction of the covering hadronic mechanics. As documented to your Commitee in preceding nominations, hadronic mechanics has indeed achieved an exact and invariant representation of all characteristic of the neutron in its synthesis from proton and electrons. In the additional historical discovery here considered, Prof. Santilli studies the origin of the "missing energy" of 0.78 MeV in the synthesis of the neutron inside stars. This energy can evidently originate from the environment inside a star. However, due to very high pressures, protons and electron are expected to be at rest during the synthesis of the neutron. This observation has lead Prof. Santilli to the hypothesis that the missing energy could originate from space conceived as a universal substratum with very high energy density, thus supporting the old hypothesis of continuous creation of matter in the universe. The transition of the missing g energy from space to matter is predicted to occur via an entity, called by Prof. Santilli **etherino** that is not a particle, but an impulse propagating through space in a longitudinal manner, thus having a speed that is a large multiple that of light. If these discoveries alone do not warrant a Nobel Prize, the qualifications of the next prize granted by the committee should be subjected to comparison.

7) R. M. Santilli, "On the laboratory synthesis of the neutron from protons and electrons," in press at Nuovo Cimento.
Download pdf format of this paper

The neutron is one of the biggest reservoirs of clean energies available to mankind because it decays with the emission of highly energetic electron that can be easily trapped (plus the innocuous and hypothetical neutrino). A necessary condition to study the possible use of the neutron as a source of new clean energies is to have experimental knowledge of its synthesis from protons and electrons. Due to his lifetime commitment to the environment, Prof. Santilli recommended for decades the experimen tal synthesis of the neutron to all major laboratories, including Fermilab, Slac, Brookhaven, Cern, Desy, Rutherford, Saclay, Jinr, etc. However, all these laboratories solely conduct extremely expensive research along old theories supported by the Nobel Foundation and, consequently, they all declined even the consideration of tests dramatically less expensive and more relevant then the politically aligned ones. As a result, Prof. Santilli was left with no other choice than that of conducting the experiment on the synthesis of the neutron at the laboratory of his Institute for Basic Research in Florida. This paper reports the results of the extensive tests. Most important is the emergence of a sort of intermediary bound state of a proton and an electron at one fermi distances with spin zero (rather than 1/2) called by Prof. Santilli **pseudoneutron** with basically new esoenergetic nuclear reactions with various substances. If this additional contribution, alone, does not warrant a Nobel Prize in Physics, what is then the reason? After all, contributions can be compared for scientific, societal and industrial relevance.

8) R. M. Santilli, "Apparent absence of dark matter due to deviations from the speed of light in the interior of stars, quasars and black holes," in press at Nova in a collection of original papers edited by Prof. V. Dvoeglazov.
Download pdf format of this paper

The conjecture of dark matter is a machination studiously conceived to maintain the dominance of Einsteinian doctrines throughout the universe. In fact, the conjecture is a necessary consequence of the assumption of the energy equivalence E = mc^2 everywhere in the universe. In this additional historical paper Prof. Santilli has shown, in his elegant scientific language, that the above scientific machination has failed to achieve the intended purpose because of a large theoretical and experimental evidence according to which the speed of light c holds only in VACUUM, with large deviations in the interior of hyperdense stars, quasars and black holes, assuming that light can propagate in these media. At any rate, the calculation of the energy E = mc^2 used by dark matter supporters for a black hole is utterly nonscientific, since it is known that physical laws do not hold there. In this paper, Prof. Santilli shows that, when academic politics on Einsteinian doctrines are put aside, there is no need of dark matter since the energy of stars, quasars and black holes is sufficient to explain the dynamics of galaxies. In the event this Committee knows of a more important paper for a Nobel Prize in Physics, its communication to me would be greatly appreciated.

9) R. M. Santilli, "Nine theorems of catastrophic inconsistencies of general relativity and their apparent resolution via isogravitation," Galilean Electrodynamics Vol. 17, special issue # 3, pages 43-59, 2006.
Download pdf format of this paper

Einstein gravitation is undoubtedly the most nonscientific field of science in history, since serious inconsistencies raised for about one century have been systematically ignored, often under public financial support. The inconsistencies are numerous already for exterior gravitational problems in vacuum, such as, the impossibility of representing the free fall along a straight radial line via curvature. The inconsistencies then become beyond scientific decency when passing to interior gravitational problems, such as the ongoing claims of studying the interior of gravitational singularities such as black holes via a theory purely formulated for the exterior problem, and inconsistent at that. Thanks to his serious mathematical knowledge (being formerly from the Department of Mathematics of Harvard University), in this paper Prof. Santilli has proved **Nine Theorems of Catastrophic Inconsistencies of Einstein Gravitation** that, unless disproved in an equally refereed journal (rather than academic parlance) eliminates gravitation on a curved manifold from any serious physical inquiry. Additionally, Prof. Santilli has proposed a possible resolution of said inconsistencies via a new theory of gravitation based on brooder mathematics, today known as ** Santilli isogravitation.** Setting up the limitations of pre-existing doctrines can only be opposed by corrupt scientists since such a setting is the evident necessary basis for advances. By recalling the river of ink and the the amounts of public money wasted in over one century on the catastrophically inconsistent Einstein gravitation, this paper alone is more important and more relevant for science and mankind that ANY paper selected by the Nobel Committee for a prize in physics during recent times. At any rate, ignorance of this paper by the Nobel Committee is an indication of its aligned, not with serious science, but with the political control of human knowledge for personal gains in complete oblivion of the interest of mankind.

Above all, I recommend Professor Ruggero Maria Santilli for the Nobel Prize in Physics because he has shown the courage necessary for the initiation of legal actions for the containment of excessively widespread scientific corruption, as illustrated by the files in the web site
www.scientificethics.org

As written by Prof. Santilli several times: ³There cannot be serious advances in basic knowledge without the joint consideration of scientific ethics and accountability.² It is hoped that, when consulting notoriously corrupt academia for a ³judgment² on Prof. Santilli¹s discoveries (usually ventured with no serious knowledge of his new mathematics, let alone his new physics and chemistry), your Committee will also jointly consider problems of scientific ethics and accountability, firstly, within the Nobel Foundation itself and, secondly, within the consulted high ranking,. but notoriously corrupt academic corridors.

In faith

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

**REFERENCES
**

**
MONOGRAPHS PROVIDED TO THE NOBEL COMMITTEE FOR PHYSICS
WITH PAST NOMINATIONS OF PROF. R. M. SANILLI SINCE 1984
CONTAININGH REFERENCES TO OVER 20,000 PAGES OF PUBLISHED RESEA4RCH**

[1] R. M. Santilli, *Foundations of Theoretical Mechanics,* Vol. I: "The Inverse Problem in Newtonian Mechanics: (1978) Springer--Verlag, Heidelberg--New York.

[2] R. M. Santilli, *Foundations of Theoretical Mechanics,* Vol. II: "Birkhoffian Generalization of Hamiltonian Mechanics" (1982) [7b] Springer--Verlag, Heidelberg--New York.

[3] R. M. Santilli, *Lie-admissible Approach to the Hadronic Structure,* Vol.I: Mathematical Foundations" (1978), Hadronic Press, Palm Harbor, Florida.

[4] R. M. Santilli, *Lie-admissible Approach to the Hadronic Structure,* Vol. II: "Theoretical Foundations" (1981) [8b], Hadronic Press, Palm Harbor, Florida.

[5] R. M. Santilli, *Isotopic Generalizations of Galileo and Einstein Relativities,* Vol.I "Mathematical Foundations" (1991), Ukraine Academy of Scieces, Kiev.

[6] R. M. Santilli, *Isotopic Generalizations of Galileo and Einstein Relativities,* Vol. II: "Theoretical Foundations" (1991), Ukraine Academy of Sciences., Kiev

[7] R. M. Santilli *Elements of Hadronic Mechanics", Vol. I: "Mathematical Foundations* (1993) Ukrain Academy of Sciences, Kiev.

[8] R. M. Santilli *Elements of Hadronic Mechanics,* Vol. II: "Theoretical Foundations" (1993) Ukrain Academy of Sciences, Kiev.

[9] R. M. Santilli, *Isotopic, Genotopic and Hyperstructural Methods in Theoretical Biology,* Ukrainian Academy of Sciences, Kiev (1996).

[10] R. M. Santilli, *The Physics of New Clean Energies and Fuels According to Hadronic Mechanics,* Special issue of the Journal of New Energy, 318 pages (1998).

[11] R. M. Santilli, *Foundations of Hadronic Chemistry with Applications to New Clean Energies and Fuels,* Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston-Dordrecht-London (2001).

Russian Translation 555 pages

[12] R. M. Santilli, *Isodual Theory of Antimatter with Applications to Antigravity, Grand Unifications and Cosmology,* Springer (2006).

[13] R. M. Santilli, *Hadronic Mathematics, Mechanics and Chemistry,* Vol. I: "Iso-, geno and hyperf-ormulations for matter and their isoduals for antimatter", International Academic Press, in press, available in pdf format in the web site

Download pdf format

[14] R. M. Santilli, *Hadronic Mathematics, Mechanics and Chemistry,* Vol. II: "Experimental verifications, theoretical advances and industrial applications," International Academic Press, in press, available in pdf format in the web site

Download pdf format

[15] A.K. Aringazin, A.Jannussis, D.F.Lopez, M.Nishioka and B.Veljanosky, *Santilli's Lie--Isotopic Generalization of Galilei's Relativities,* Kostarakis Publisher, Athens, Greece (1980).

[16] J. V. Kadeisvili, *Santilli's Isotopies of Contemporary Algebras, Geometries and Relativities,* Second Edition, Ukraine Academy of Sciences, Kiev (1997).

[17] J. Lohmus, E. Paal and L. Sorgsepp, *Nonassociative Algebras in Physics with applications to Santilli Lie-admissible algebras,* Hadronic Press, Palm Harbor, FL, (1994).

[18] D. S. Sourlas and G. T. Tsagas, *Mathematical Foundations of the Lie-Santilli Theory,* Ukraine Academy of Sciences, Kiev (1993).

[19] S. Vacaru, *Interactions, Strings and Santilli Isotopies in Higher Order Anisotropic Superspaces,*
Hadronic Press (1999).

[20] R. M. Falcon Ganfornina and J. Nunez Valdes, *Fondamentos de la Isoteoria de Lie-Santilli,* (in Spanish) International Academic Press, America-Europe-Asia, (2001),

Download pdf format

[21] Chun-Xuan Jiang,*Foundations of Santilli's Isonumber Theory,* International Academic Press (2002), also available in the pdf file

Download pdf format

**COPIES TO
**

**
Professors Storch, Marcus, Chairman,
Öquist, Gunnar; Sohlman, Michael; Jörnvall,
Hans; Wallenberg, Jacob; Mjøs, Ole D.; Gräslund,
Astrid; and Sundqvist, Bo;
Board of Directors
The Nobel Foundation
P.O. Box 5232, SE-102 45 Stockholm, Sweden
**

**
and to
**

**
To Professors Gunnar von Hejne, .Astrid Graslund,
Sven Lidin, Anders Liljas, Lars, and Hakan Wennerstrom
Members, Nobel Committee for Chemistry
The nobel Foundation
Box 50005, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden
**

**
**

P. O. Box 1577 Palm Harbor, Florida 34682, U.S.A. Email: ibr@gte.net